Dit artikel is deel van de DaanSpeak-serie
Waarom
oorlog?
Waarom stort de Westerse
wereld onder leiding van de VS ons nu in een oorlog die mogelijk nog jaren
gaat duren? Dat is wat DaanSpeak zichzelf al een tijd afvraagt. Stukje bij
beetje hopen we het antwoord op deze vraag te vinden.
Vandaag deel 1 van een serie waarin olie centraal staat
als een mogelijk antwoord op deze vraag.
Blood for oil - 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
25nov01
'A book written by two French intelligence analysts is certain to embarrass
President George W Bush and his administration. The book, Bin Laden, La
Verite Interdite (Bin Laden, the Forbidden Truth), released recently,
claims that Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Deputy Director John
O'Neill resigned in July in protest over Bush's obstruction of an
investigation into Taliban's terrorist activities. The authors, Jean-Charles
Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, claim that Bush resorted to this obstruction
under the influence of the United States' oil companies, schrijft 'V K
Shashikumar' in een artikel
met de titel 'America's dirty Afghan secret: it's a war over oil'. Shashikumar
zegt (en onderbouwt) over de auteurs 'they have an impressive record in
intelligence analysis'. Lees het artikel vooral zelf in zijn geheel,
maar hieronder staan alvast een paar uitsneden.
'Bush stymied the intelligence agency's investigations
on terrorism, even as it bargained with the Taliban on handing over of
Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid.
"The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism
were US oil corporate interests, and the role played by Saudi Arabia in
it," O'Neill reportedly told the authors. According to the Brisard
and Dasquie, the main objective of the US government in Afghanistan prior
to Black Tuesday was aimed at consolidating the Taliban regime, in order
to obtain access to the oil and gas reserves in Central Asia.
[...]
Prior to September 11, the US government had an extremely benevolent understanding
of the Taliban regime. The Taliban was perceived "as a source of stability
in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil pipeline
across Central Asia" from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan
and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean.
This would have secured for the US another huge captive and alternate
oil resource centre. "The oil and gas reserves of
Central Asia have been controlled by Russia. The Bush government wanted
to change all that…this rationale of energy security changed into a military
one," the authors claim.
"At one moment during the negotiations, US representatives told the Taliban,
'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under
a carpet of bombs'," Brisard said in an interview in Paris.
[...]
Brisard and Dasquie also reveal that the Taliban
were not really ultra-orthodox in their diplomatic approach, because they
actually hired an American public relations' expert for an image-making
campaign in the US. It is, of course, not known whether the Pakistanis
helped the Taliban secure the services of a professional image-maker.
What is, however, revealed in the book is that Laila
Helms, a public relations professional, who also doubles up as an authority
on the way the US intelligence agencies work, was employed by the
Taliban. Her task was to get the US recognise the Taliban regime. Prior
to September 11, only three countries - Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE
- recognised the Taliban regime. Helms' familiarity with the ways of US
intelligence organisations comes through her association with Richard
Helms, who is her uncle a former director of the CIA and former US ambassador
to Tehran.
Helms is described as the Mata Hari of US-Taliban negotiations. The authors
claim that she brought Sayed Rahmatullah Hashimi, an advisor to Mullah
Omar, to Washington for five days in March 2001 - after the Taliban had
destroyed the ancient Buddhas of Bamiyan. Hashimi met the Directorate
of Central Intelligence at the CIA, and the Bureau of Intelligence and
Research at the State Department.
[...]
"Jean-Charles Brisard, who wrote a report on bin Laden's finances for
the French intelligence agency DST, and is co-author of Hidden Truth,
met O'Neill several times last summer. [O'Neill]
complained bitterly that the US State Department - and behind it the oil
lobby who make up President Bush's entourage - blocked attempts to prove
bin Laden's guilt."
"The US ambassador to Yemen, Barbara Bodine, forbade O'Neill and his team
of so- called Rambos (as the Yemeni authorities called them) from entering
Yemen. In August 2001, O'Neill resigned in frustration, and took up a
new job as head of security at the World Trade Center. [O'Neill]
died in the September 11 attack."
[...]
The US' hedging on investigating Taliban's terrorist activities and its
links with bin Laden were premised on the belief that a quid pro quo deal
could be arranged with Taliban. The deal, apparently, was oil for diplomatic
and international recognition. One important reason
for Operation Enduring Freedom could well be securing American oil interests
in the region. It would not be surprising if the pipeline project
is put back on track soon. Even a cursory look at the oil potential of
the Central Asian region is enough to understand the American interest
in this region. The Caspian Sea basin encompassing countries like Azerbaijan,
Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are believed to possess some 200
billion barrels of oil, which is about one-third the amount found in the
Persian Gulf area. [Zie ook dit kaartje
over de oliesituatie terplekke].
[...]
However, the US dependence on Middle Eastern oil is not a secret. The
US national energy policy, released by the Bush administration earlier
this year, stated, "The Gulf will be a primary focus of US international
energy policy." According to Michael T Klare, professor of peace and world
security studies at Hampshire College in Amherst, and author of Resource
Wars: The New Landscape of Global Conflict, by launching Operation Enduring
Freedom, the US want to achieve two sets of objectives:
"First, to capture and punish those responsible for the September 11 attacks,
and to prevent further acts of terrorism; and two, to consolidate US power
in the Persian Gulf and Caspian Sea area, and to ensure continued flow
of oil. And while the second set may get
far less public attention than the first, this does not mean that is any
less important."
With many senior members of the Bush administration linked to major oil
business interests, it more than a matter of coincidence
that the US is involved in a war in Afghanistan. Vice-President
Dick Cheney was, until the end of last year, president of Halliburton,
a company that provides services for the oil industry. US National Security
Advisor Condoleezza Rice was, between 1991 and 2000, manager for Chevron;
secretaries of commerce and energy, Donald Evans and Stanley Abraham,
worked for Tom Brown, another oil giant. [Lees hier
meer over de oliebelangen van de leden van de regering Bush].
[...]'
DaanSpeak
Meld je aan voor de gratis
mailing list.