Dit artikel is deel van de DaanSpeak-serie
11
september
Witte Huis werkt onderzoekers 11 september
tegen 1 2 3
Newsweek kopt:
'Will the White House block a terror
panels access to critical documents?'
11mei03
Het Witte Huis blijft in gevecht over de waarheid van 11 september. Niet
om die aan het licht te brengen, maar om de waarheid te maskeren. In het
vorige
deel van deze serie schreven we over hoe het Witte Huis bezig is met
een 'behind-the-scenes battle to restrict public disclosure of key events
relating to the attacks' van 11 september 2001. 'BUT THE BATTLE over the
issue is far from over', schrijft
Newsweek nu.
Het Witte Huis is bereid tot het uiterste te gaan: '[...] NEWSWEEK has
learned, President Bushs chief lawyer [Alberto Gonzales] has privately
signaled that the White House may seek to invoke executive
privilege over key documents relating to the attacks in order to keep them
out of the hands of investigators for the National Commission on
Terror Attacks Upon the United Statesthe independent
panel created by Congress to probe all aspects of 9-11.'
[...]
Philip Zelikow, the executive director for the commission [...] 'says he
is still hopeful an accommodation can be reached with administration lawyers
and that the issue is now in the hands of senior officials in the White
House. But he made it clear that the 9-11 panel has no intention of backing
down from its insistence that it receive full access to a wide range of
material that has never been reviewed by any outside bodymuch less
made public. We expect to get what we need, Zelikow says. Were
not going to go quietly into that good night.
[...]
Among the most sensitive documents the commission
is known to be interested in reviewing are internal National Security Council
minutes from the spring and summer of 2001 when the CIA and other intelligence
agencies were warning that an attack by Al Qaeda could well be imminent.'
Achtergebleven familieleden strijden terug tegen Witte
Huis
'We, the 9-11 Victims' Family Members, urgently ask everyone who receives
this to either call or fax a letter to the White House letting them know
that they are outraged, as we are, by the possibility
of the Bush Administration trying to block pertinent information from getting
to the Independent 9-11 Commission. Preventing the
truth from coming out will cause this country to remain in peril.
Sincerely, Mindy Kleinberg
The White House Phone Numbers are:
COMMENTS LINE: 202-456-1111
TELEPHONE SWITCHBOARD: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461', aldus een email die de ronde doet.
Kapers hadden erg veel mazzel
Kleinberg heeft haar man verloren bij de aanslag op 11 september. Ze heeft
een statement
gegeven aan de commissie dat er niet om liegt. Het belangrijkste deel leidt
ze in met de zin: '[...] the 9/11 terrorists were not just lucky once: they
were lucky over and over again. Allow me to illustrate.' Ze noemt
de handel op de beurs met voorkennis (lees hierover en over soortgelijke
voorbeelden in ons uitgebreide 911-voorkennisartikel)
en geeft andere voorbeelden: 'I am holding in my hand the applications of
the terrorists who killed my husband. All of these forms are incomplete
and incorrect. [...] Had the INS or State Department followed the law, at
least 15 of the hijackers would have been denied visas and would not have
been in the United States on September 11th, 2001.' De reden dat de kapers
toch de VS binnen zijn gekomen staat in het genoemde 911-voorkennisartikel.
Luchtverdediging
bleef aan de grond
Kleinberg vervolgt haar statement en geeft voorbeelden van de ongelooflijke
aaneenschakelingen van mazzel die de kapers hadden. Een van de voorbeelden
betreft de toevalligheden met betrekking tot de verdediging van het luchtruim:
'Tragically the fighter jets were not deployed until 8:52 a.m. -- a full
32 minutes after the loss of contact with flight 11. Why was there a delay
in the FAA notifying NORAD? Why was there a delay in NORAD scrambling fighter
jets? How is this possible when NEADS was fully staffed with planes at the
ready and monitoring our Northeast airspace? Flight's 175, 77 and 93 all
had this same repeat pattern of delays in notification and delays in scrambling
fighter jets. Delays that are unimaginable considering a plane had, by this
time, already hit the WTC [.] Even more baffling for us is the fact that
the fighter jets were not scrambled from the closest air force bases.'
Hoe was het
allemaal mogelijk?
Daarna vertelt ze wat 'Joint Chief of staff Myers', Donald Rumsfeld en George
W. Bush die ochtend deden en vooral niet deden. Al met al heeft ze veel
vragen: 'Is it luck that aberrant stock trades were not monitored?
Is it luck when 15 visas are awarded based on incomplete forms? Is it luck
when Airline Security screenings allow hijackers to board planes with box
cutters and pepper spray? Is it luck when Emergency FAA and NORAD protocols
are not followed? Is it luck when a national emergency is not reported to
top government officials on a timely basis?'.
Met dank aan
We kwamen bij het Newsweek-artikel terecht, dankzij een email van Webster
Tarpley (die we nog kennen van onze interviews met hem voor onze documentaire
over Skull & Bones). Hij is co-auteur van het uitstekende boek (gratis
online) 'George Bush, The Unauthorized Biography'. Hij weet als geen
ander hoe gevaarlijk het is om een Bush in het Witte Huis te hebben.
DaanSpeak
Meld je aan via email voor de gratis
mailing list.